| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ottis413

Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 292 Location: West Virginia, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:25 pm Post subject: The ages of the hobbits at the time of Bilbos bd party.. |
|
|
Ok, so I wright this story and figure I'll do the research later to finish it up. The stories a short one about Merry and Pippin at the time of Bilbos 111th birthday party... So, the wife and I sat down to figure up their ages (we had never thought about it before) and here's what we came up with;
Name-----------------------year born------------age at Bilbos party(3001/1400SR)
Bilbo Baggins,............... Bn 2890 / 1298SR......................111
Frodo Baggins,...............Bn 2968 / 1367SR.......................33
Samwise Gamgee,..........Bn 2983 / 1382SR......................18
Peregrin Took,................Bn 2991 / 1390SR.......................10
Meriadoc Brandybuck, ....Bn 2983 / 1382SR......................18
(Eomer was also bn in 2991, same as Pip, ... Eowyn bn in 2995)
Is this true??? Pip was 10 years old at the time? If this is right then it screws the story I just wrote, unless I just add a note saying it's based on the movies, where their ages were closer together. (Merry and Pip in their late "tweens" and Frodo 33, and Sam about the same age... but I really don't like to do that. (but I do think it's a good story )
So what's your opinion ?? Rewright it to happen at a later date? or call it a "movie-based story? _________________ When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse, Out of the corner of my eye
I turned to look but it was gone
I cannot put my finger on it now
The child is grown, the dream is gone.
Pink Floyd, Comfortably numb
**********************************************************
OSA Nazgul#8. The little Nagzul wot cud spall (Don't call me the redneck Nazgul, I prefer the term 'Appalachian Nazgul') |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeumeIndil

Joined: 06 Jun 2005 Posts: 1084 Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd make it movie cannon since your math is accurate to the books and re-writing to reset the thing is gonna be a pain in the... back 40. Frodo was 50+ in the books when he left the Shire, sold the house etc. etc.. Pippin and Merry (And... Fredgar Bulger I think was his name) had become a bit like Frodo had been to Bilbo before the "adoption"- the youngsters he ran around with to keep himself from stagnating. I always figured that was why Pippin missed Gandalf's fireworks so much- he would have been one of the little shavers trying to catch the butterflies and such while Merry and Sam were girl watching or drinking ale or whatever 18 year old Hobbits do.
There's nothing wrong with using movie cannon, especially if you add an Author's Note explaining this ^ stuff. I know people who prefer it because they don't know cannon well or only know the movies. Personally, cannon or movie based doesn't stop me from reading a good story, I just like to know before I go into it if I'm in an Altered Universe or the Movie world. _________________ An Infinite Source of Pervy Wisdom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ottis413

Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 292 Location: West Virginia, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the input, My wife just made the comment that she doesn't remember Pip being mentioned as being at the party, (in the book, tho I'm sure he was) like you said, they were prob busy doing different things, and didn't get to be real close frends till later... _________________ When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse, Out of the corner of my eye
I turned to look but it was gone
I cannot put my finger on it now
The child is grown, the dream is gone.
Pink Floyd, Comfortably numb
**********************************************************
OSA Nazgul#8. The little Nagzul wot cud spall (Don't call me the redneck Nazgul, I prefer the term 'Appalachian Nazgul') |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeumeIndil

Joined: 06 Jun 2005 Posts: 1084 Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Btw, thanks. You pointed out Eomer and Eowyn's birthdays in your figuring up there and made me look again at timelines for one of my own fics (femme fatal/ horse lord smut)... turns out I screwed up my math and my OC's age was bass-ackwards.
And they say people in West Virginia can't do math! (jk)
Thanks again,
One of the OSA Useless Nuts _________________ An Infinite Source of Pervy Wisdom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhapsody

Joined: 11 Apr 2004 Posts: 1153 Location: Maglor's Lap
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Something to consider Ottis is that Hobbits were considered as tweens up until the age of 33. They reached maturity at that age.
Also Frodo is family of Merry and Pippin, so that explains their close bond. Hobbit children are called faunts.
I went to a different list (Stories of Arda) and one of the Hobbit writers, Dreamflower gave this explanations:
Question asked: Ok how does it work, I was reading a fic where they had the Hobbit age and the Human age and I noticed that the
older the Hobbit got the longer the distance between Human and hobbit age became. Is there a reason for that?
The answer:
It is because the ratio is approximately two-thirds. Two-thirds for a three year old is two,with a difference of one year; two-thirds for a fifteen year old is ten, with a difference of five years; two-thirds for a thirty-three year old is going to leave a difference of about eleven years, and so forth.
Some people have it that the age gap closes up as the hobbits get older, but I don't really see a reason for that. Other people ignore it altogether, and some people have it that the age is the same up until hobbits become tweens, where they have an extended adolescence, and then goes back to being the same when they come of age. All of that ignores the hints that JRRT gave us in his etters, however.
Dreamflower _________________ I have not lost my mind - it's backed up on disk somewhere...
Maglor's bard & Celegorm's play pal
Nazgul #5 in charge anything liquid or edible things
Icon made by Carnage in c minor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SilverMoonLady

Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 1201 Location: Breaking in a Brandybuck... *wicked grin*
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just a little thing, not everybody agrees on the age calculation... and what that means for development, social & physical. But that's a whole other ball of wax  _________________ Suffering an again off again connection with life...
The joy of motherhood: what a woman experiences when all the kids are in bed.
*local PHF union rep* *tart of the week*
Shelob the Cookie Baker |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ottis413

Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 292 Location: West Virginia, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rhapsody wrote: |
It is because the ratio is approximately two-thirds. Two-thirds for a three year old is two,with a difference of one year; two-thirds for a fifteen year old is ten, with a difference of five years; two-thirds for a thirty-three year old is going to leave a difference of about eleven years, and so forth. Dreamflower[/i] |
Thats something I hadn't thought of, but it works out..
I've really learned a lot sence I joined up here..  _________________ When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse, Out of the corner of my eye
I turned to look but it was gone
I cannot put my finger on it now
The child is grown, the dream is gone.
Pink Floyd, Comfortably numb
**********************************************************
OSA Nazgul#8. The little Nagzul wot cud spall (Don't call me the redneck Nazgul, I prefer the term 'Appalachian Nazgul') |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ghettoelleth

Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 1804
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ottis, best little piece of advice I'm ever going to give you, passed down to me from the really old peeps (ahem, not nancy or inglor, really). Go to the books, all of this information is there and its not diluted with perception. That's how you get canon. If you have questions or need a scan, let someone know. You know how that works. _________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can not confirm their validity." Abraham Lincoln |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhapsody

Joined: 11 Apr 2004 Posts: 1153 Location: Maglor's Lap
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ghettoelleth is, as far as I am concerned, the canon queen. If she doesn't know.. _________________ I have not lost my mind - it's backed up on disk somewhere...
Maglor's bard & Celegorm's play pal
Nazgul #5 in charge anything liquid or edible things
Icon made by Carnage in c minor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SilverMoonLady

Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 1201 Location: Breaking in a Brandybuck... *wicked grin*
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rhapsody wrote: | Something to consider Ottis is that Hobbits were considered as tweens up until the age of 33. They reached maturity at that age.
Also Frodo is family of Merry and Pippin, so that explains their close bond. Hobbit children are called faunts.
I went to a different list (Stories of Arda) and one of the Hobbit writers, Dreamflower gave this explanations:
Question asked: Ok how does it work, I was reading a fic where they had the Hobbit age and the Human age and I noticed that the
older the Hobbit got the longer the distance between Human and hobbit age became. Is there a reason for that?
The answer:
It is because the ratio is approximately two-thirds. Two-thirds for a three year old is two,with a difference of one year; two-thirds for a fifteen year old is ten, with a difference of five years; two-thirds for a thirty-three year old is going to leave a difference of about eleven years, and so forth.
Some people have it that the age gap closes up as the hobbits get older, but I don't really see a reason for that. Other people ignore it altogether, and some people have it that the age is the same up until hobbits become tweens, where they have an extended adolescence, and then goes back to being the same when they come of age. All of that ignores the hints that JRRT gave us in his etters, however.
Dreamflower |
Yeah, ok, I like Dreamflower and her crew well enough, and I respect them and their opinions, but by their calculations, Frodo left a 12 year old Merry alone to fend off any and all lingerers after the gift-giving... That, and other little niggling bits are equally ignored, right along with the fact that nothing is ever mentioned about their feet being any larger than normal either... But, I'm in the silent minority. Both are accepted conjectures, and so I will shut up. _________________ Suffering an again off again connection with life...
The joy of motherhood: what a woman experiences when all the kids are in bed.
*local PHF union rep* *tart of the week*
Shelob the Cookie Baker |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ghettoelleth

Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 1804
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, wait, cross that out stoopid and put the expectant weeble who for some odd reason gets no props among the others but hey, maybe its suppose to be a secret. _________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can not confirm their validity." Abraham Lincoln |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SilverMoonLady

Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 1201 Location: Breaking in a Brandybuck... *wicked grin*
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
eh?
*disappears in a puff of logic, to the great relief of everyone involved* _________________ Suffering an again off again connection with life...
The joy of motherhood: what a woman experiences when all the kids are in bed.
*local PHF union rep* *tart of the week*
Shelob the Cookie Baker |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhapsody

Joined: 11 Apr 2004 Posts: 1153 Location: Maglor's Lap
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SilverMoonLady wrote: |
Yeah, ok, I like Dreamflower and her crew well enough, and I respect them and their opinions, but by their calculations, Frodo left a 12 year old Merry alone to fend off any and all lingerers after the gift-giving... That, and other little niggling bits are equally ignored, right along with the fact that nothing is ever mentioned about their feet being any larger than normal either... But, I'm in the silent minority. Both are accepted conjectures, and so I will shut up. |
LOL, you know, I completely suck with math's (really no joke). If it is buried somewhere in Tolkien's letters, I'd say look there. I always have my hobbit material checked by Marigold and if she tells it's ok...  _________________ I have not lost my mind - it's backed up on disk somewhere...
Maglor's bard & Celegorm's play pal
Nazgul #5 in charge anything liquid or edible things
Icon made by Carnage in c minor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SilverMoonLady

Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 1201 Location: Breaking in a Brandybuck... *wicked grin*
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
It ain't so much the math that bugs me as the socio-cultural stuff that comes of it... *shrug* But then, I'm an anthropologist and rebel...  _________________ Suffering an again off again connection with life...
The joy of motherhood: what a woman experiences when all the kids are in bed.
*local PHF union rep* *tart of the week*
Shelob the Cookie Baker |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhapsody

Joined: 11 Apr 2004 Posts: 1153 Location: Maglor's Lap
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SilverMoonLady wrote: | It ain't so much the math that bugs me as the socio-cultural stuff that comes of it... *shrug* But then, I'm an anthropologist and rebel...  |
Looks again at the message... maybe I am missing something so eh..
 _________________ I have not lost my mind - it's backed up on disk somewhere...
Maglor's bard & Celegorm's play pal
Nazgul #5 in charge anything liquid or edible things
Icon made by Carnage in c minor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|