| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Maram68 Challenge Admin

Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 535 Location: West from East
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lossefalme01 wrote: | But, that makes me wonder... everyone talks about what is BAD about Legomances... but what is considered a GOOD Legomance? One that breaks cliches? One with a really good and believable OFC? One with a very original plotline? One that sticks very close to canon? One that keeps Legolas in character? One that's NOT a self-insertion fic?
I would like for anyone who doesn't like Legomances (for any reason OTHER than Legolas is just not your favorite character) to fill the rest of us Legomance authors in! Just what is it you look for in a GOOD Legomance? |
I think you pointed out some very valid ideas. As a die hard MS/Legomance writer I'd like to know, in the very thin hope to improve as a writer and, in the end, maybe be able to fool somebody into reading my stuff and not think they are reading a MS ...
Nevertheless, I think that what makes a good Legomance is, for instance, what makes any other kind of story worth reading: a compelling plot, a believable setting and a story you can relate to and long to keep on reading ...
 _________________ Lord, grant me the Serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the Courage to change the things I can and the Wisdom to hide the bodies of the people I may have to kill because they piss me off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thuriniel
Joined: 29 Jul 2003 Posts: 665 Location: Watching the purple sky fly over me ...
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Viv"] | SpaceWeavil wrote: | | Quote: | We had a challenge about doing a ‘modern girl in ME’ story without the usual clichés – how about one for a Legomance along the same lines?
[/url] |
You mean, something along the lines of "Write a Legomance -- yes, Legolas + OFC -- that doesn't make Baby Eru weep"?
 |
Am I the only one who thinks this is a great idea ?! _________________ ~ boe an phân pedi ‘lam dadui ~
~ everyone should speak a second language ~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cormak

Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 12 Location: MA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Thuriniel"] | Viv wrote: | | SpaceWeavil wrote: | | Quote: | We had a challenge about doing a ‘modern girl in ME’ story without the usual clichés – how about one for a Legomance along the same lines?
[/url] |
You mean, something along the lines of "Write a Legomance -- yes, Legolas + OFC -- that doesn't make Baby Eru weep"?
 |
Am I the only one who thinks this is a great idea ?! |
Definitely not since I'm writing one already! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lossefalme01

Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 31 Location: Missouri, USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking more on the subject of Legomances and MS's today and came to one of my points about what makes a GOOD Legomance: "one that breaks all cliches". The more I thought abou this, the more I thought it was just impossible. What I mean by that is this:
Let's say you have an OFC who is a pretty stubborn and willfull gal, and naturally wishes to fight in all the battles. Thus she strongly states her case to the men about the fact she wants to fight, much as Eowyn did in the books. Now, already having this much in your story can make your character cliche, and by some people's definitions, a Mary Sue.
So. You're already saddled with an MS. Now, your girl either gets permission to fight (still cliche), or she doesn't (probably more canon). BUT... if she doesn't get to fight, you then have more choices. She either sneaks out and fights anyway (cliched again) or she doesn't (er... has that actually ever happened in a fic?)
If your OFC isn't very strong willed and DOESN'T want to fight, but would prefer the men to do the fighting, instead of being praised for having a character that's truthfully more realistic to Tolkien's world, you are said to have another Mary Sue type character, because now she is too weak to fight and the men must protect her.
Do you see the difficulty here? Of course, this is only through my experiences, so maybe you others have had better ones, but I find it just slightly frustrating that it seems no matter what you do with your OFC she's cliched and labeled an MS. That's why I was very curious to find out what other people thought made a GOOD Legomance. I would have to agree also though that the key components that make up a good story are really all the same for any type of fanfiction... I just thought I'd raise the question for some specifics of Legomances since so far that's all I've written!  _________________ Though here at journey's end I lie
in darkness buried deep,
beyond all towers strong and high,
beyond all mountains steep,
above all shadows rides the Sun
and Stars forever dwell:
I will not say the Day is done,
nor bid the Stars farewell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sindohte

Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 1621 Location: Rubbing up against an Elf
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I enjoy reading a well written story plain and simple. When it comes to Legomances I do not think there is any special set of criteria that needs to be developed for that genre separate from any other particular branch of Tolkien based fanfics. One thing that I have noticed in reading stories about Legolas that involve OFCs, there is the tendency for authors to focus too heavily on the romance portion of the story while forgetting about the action side of things. Certainly love or lust can spring up in unexpected places such as on the battlefield, but it would not cause Legolas and female Ranger, etc., to throw all caution to the wind and start shagging each other while they are supposed to be on patrol guarding their camp against Orcs. What I want to read is a story about Legolas that is also romantic, rather than a romance that happens to have Legolas in it. _________________ abandon thought, and let the dream descend...
Last edited by sindohte on Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:09 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cormak

Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 12 Location: MA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sindohte wrote: | | I enjoy reading a well written story plain and simple. When it comes to Legomances I do not think there is any special set of criteria that needs to be developed for that genre separate from any other particular branch of Tolkien based fanfics. One thing that I have noticed in read stories about Legolas that involve OFCs, there is the tendency for authors to focus too heavily on the romance portion of the story while forgetting about the action side of things. Certainly love or lust can spring up in unexpected places such as on the battlefield, but it would not cause Legolas and female Ranger, etc., to throw all caution to the wind and start shagging each other while they are supposed to be on patrol guarding their camp against Orcs. What I want to read is a story about Legolas that is also romantic, rather than a romance that happens to have Legolas in it. |
You bring up a really good point. And something that I have been very careful with my own story to avoid. There has to be a careful balance of action and romance. Lots of romance may make the story too sweet or too unbelievable while too much action and fighting may turn readers away because there is not much romance. I think it's very difficult to find the correct balance between the two.
One thing that really annoys me about Legomance fics is either the OC or Legolas realizing at or around the first meeting that they love the other. Love takes time to develop, it does not happen overnight. Lust happens overnight and from all the research I have done on Tolkien's Elves, they are not into lust unless they are married. I also don't like stories where Legolas sleeps with every woman he sees, Elf or Mortal. Elves don't do that. Sex is marriage to them. So arranged marriage stories are usually out for me too. Of course there are exceptions to the rules or my dislikes that I do like and that is because the author has written their story so well that it is believable.
Lossefalme makes good points about how difficult it is to write an OC without it being labeled a MS. I think that really has to do with the reader. I have written stories in many genres. Some people think my characters are OCs and others claim they are without a doubt MSs. What I have noticed from most readers/reviewers is that because the term MS is used by just about everyone, that an OC regardless of how they are written is a MS. Many readers don't know that a MS used to be known as a self insertion character. They believe MS and OC are the same thing. The term MS has evolved into something different from what it used to be.
When I first started writing and sharing stories on the internet in 1998, a Mary Sue was a character in a story that pretty much was the author. The MS liked the same foods and hobbies, dressed as the author dressed or wanted to dress. She was without a flaw. At that time an OC was a well written original character that was not the author.
Now to most people they are the same thing, which is a real shame. Lots of really good stories get overlooked because the term MS or OC might be associated. [/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sindohte

Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 1621 Location: Rubbing up against an Elf
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm, Legolas must be on the brain today because I have another thought to share about the fair haired one. Legolas fanfics seem to be hampered by the fact that a large number of writers (myself & Roisin included) have done stories where the OFC meets up with Legolas during the events leading up to the War of the Ring. And that is just such a small time period from Legolas's life as a whole. Why haven't more writers done stories featuring Legolas and an OFC in the days prior to the WotR or during the 4th Age?
Perhaps one reason critics of Legomances attack the stories in general is that there were truly not that many instances of women going off to battle and fighting side by side with the men. Certainly Eowyn was a notable exception, but she still had to sneak off to join her uncle and brother. In our story, Roisin and I speculated that a small number of female Rangers would be part of the Grey company and did a blurb at the beginning making note of the fact that the role of women in history was often forgotten and we were writing about a lost period from Legolas's life.
Would there be less cries of Mary Sue from critics, if writers wrote stories about Legolas having a relationship with an OFC either prior or after the WotR?
Now that I reflect upon things a bit more closely, it is difficult to develop a credible story featuring the events of the WotR and a romance between Legolas and his love interest. I am not saying that it cannot be done, because I have read some good examples hosted here at OSA for instance, but I have encountered many more examples of poorly done action/romances.
And why is there such a proliferation of WotR based Legomances? Can we lay the blame at the feet of Peter Jackson for picking Orlando Bloom to play the role of Legolas and thus spawning the slew of stories? _________________ abandon thought, and let the dream descend... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cormak

Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 12 Location: MA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Part of the reason I wrote a Legomance was because of who he was cast as in the movie. The other part was because I love his character in the book and he doesn't really get much of a background. We know who his father and grandfather are, but we don't know his mother or if he ever loved anyone.
It's interesting that you brought up about the time frame issue. It's certainly very true that most writers put their stories at the time of the War of the Ring. Part of that might be because they are interested in acquiring readers. Most people lose interest in stories that are made up of one canon character and all original characters UNLESS they write those OCs really well. A lot of readers want to see Aragorn, Gandalf, Frodo and the other hobbits in the story because they relate to those characters more. Daw the Minstril from Stories of Arda is an example of someone who has written stories that have taken place at a time not usually written about and her stories are FULL of OCs that are really interesting. Her stories are not Legomances but Legolas does feature in them.
I have a Legomance fic outlined after I finish MF that hopefully will be very different from what has been done, but we'll see how that works out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sindohte

Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 1621 Location: Rubbing up against an Elf
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cormak wrote: | | Part of the reason I wrote a Legomance was because of who he was cast as in the movie. The other part was because I love his character in the book and he doesn't really get much of a background. We know who his father and grandfather are, but we don't know his mother or if he ever loved anyone. |
That definitely spurred me with my writing efforts. A story about Legolas exploring some of those background issues, such as his family life, etc., not touched upon in either the books or the movies is fascinating. I am curious to see what people can do with those blank spots in his life. Like who were Legolas's friends?
| Quote: | | It's interesting that you brought up about the time frame issue. It's certainly very true that most writers put their stories at the time of the War of the Ring. Part of that might be because they are interested in acquiring readers. Most people lose interest in stories that are made up of one canon character and all original characters UNLESS they write those OCs really well. A lot of readers want to see Aragorn, Gandalf, Frodo and the other hobbits in the story because they relate to those characters more. |
Certainly appealing to the reading public might be part of it, but do you think that part of the motivation might be impatience? What I mean by that comment is that a large number of the people who are reading a LOTR fanfic have seen at least one of the three movies. That means an author does not have to spend a lot of time going into working on the characterization of Merry or Pippin for instance, because they can simply fall back upon what Peter Jackson, Dom, and Billy did with those characters in the movie.
I think that is a shame and can result in two-dimensional characters, instead of a fully realized literary creation. So for some people it might be that they don't want to bother with filling up a few pages of fleshing out the other members of the Fellowship because it might interfere with their romance or maybe they are not sure how to develop a three dimensional character. _________________ abandon thought, and let the dream descend... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpaceWeavil

Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Looking at shiny things
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I think that is a shame and can result in two-dimensional characters, instead of a fully realized literary creation. So for some people it might be that they don't want to bother with filling up a few pages of fleshing out the other members of the Fellowship because it might interfere with their romance or maybe they are not sure how to develop a three dimensional character. |
It could also be a question of research, perhaps not on this archive, but certainly on FF. Net. Setting the story within the framework the movies covered saves people having to figure out where people were and what they were doing at the time, or at least there is not as much difficulty working out where the story fits in with the history of ME etc. Setting something years before would involve checking what else was going on, reading the appendices etc., and looking at some of the Legolas stories on FF.Net, I wonder if any of them have even read the books at times.
That’s not to say that anyone who sets their story during the War of the Ring is a shabby writer or doesn’t do research. Just offering a suggestion as to why there might be so many written in that period. _________________ Pervy Nazgul Fancier and owner of Fluffy the Fell Beast |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cormak

Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 12 Location: MA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
THat's certainly a very good point about not wanting to flesh out the characters. (This is a great discussion, btw. Really gets the mind thinking!) Impatience is a BIG part of it. You don't know how many people I have hounding me for Legolas and my OC to kiss and get it on. I"ve written 29 chapters and they haven't done anything yet. I've actually lost readers because it hasn't happened soon enough. So impatience is definitely there! You see lots of stories where the romance happens really quickly because the writers and the pressure from readers causes them to write quickly instead of taking time and letting things take their course.
I do believe a big part of it is because many authors want reviews. So many people are review mongers. Reviews and feedback is what makes them write. They leave the sort of Author's Notes that say "If you like this story review and it will make me update faster" or "Review or I won't write anymore." That sort of attitude is all over ff.net as well as other places. While it's nice to tally up reviews it's nicer to improve your writing.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpaceWeavil

Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Looking at shiny things
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
That’s a good point about reviews. Each time I check my new Gríma story and see the ‘0’ review thing or see that it’s had no readers since the last time I checked two days ago or whatever, there is a temptation to just give up and write something people will actually look at. That attitude of ‘review or I don’t write any more’ is a pain though. Sure, you want people to review. It’s one of the best ways to spot flaws in your work and get them sorted, thus improving as a writer, but if that’s the only reason you write, should you really bother?
This is a good thread though, as it has got the neurones firing I might actually get around to redrafting my Legolas story here (non-romance though), and having seen what not to do, I might think again about doing the sequel I plotted. _________________ Pervy Nazgul Fancier and owner of Fluffy the Fell Beast |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Viv Challenge Admin

Joined: 24 Apr 2003 Posts: 71 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
True Confession Time...
1. My Legomance is NC-17 from paragraph 5, and the right-off-the-bat explicit smut is a major plot point. Is is salvagable?
2. When I read one of those "If you don't review, I won't write any more!" things, I immediately stop reading, delete the notepad review I'd been working on, and add that writer to my super-secret list of Ficwriters I Will Never Read Again.
3. I rarely review a story if the writer of that story hasn't left at least one review on this archive. Those folks who post their stories and then just sit back and wait for the reviews to roll in squick me. If you're gonna beg, at least give.
(Hey, at least point #1 was on topic...) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thuriniel
Joined: 29 Jul 2003 Posts: 665 Location: Watching the purple sky fly over me ...
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Viv wrote: | True Confession Time...
1. My Legomance is NC-17 from paragraph 5, and the right-off-the-bat explicit smut is a major plot point. Is is salvagable?
2. When I read one of those "If you don't review, I won't write any more!" things, I immediately stop reading, delete the notepad review I'd been working on, and add that writer to my super-secret list of Ficwriters I Will Never Read Again.
3. I rarely review a story if the writer of that story hasn't left at least one review on this archive. Those folks who post their stories and then just sit back and wait for the reviews to roll in squick me. If you're gonna beg, at least give.
(Hey, at least point #1 was on topic...) |
1. As I recall, it was superb smut and very well written. I was sort of a "smut virgin " when I read it and I remember blushing quite a bit and thinking to myself "I wonder if I could ever write smut like that" ... personally, I think it was a fabulous way of starting your fic ! -- OK, I'm assuming here we're talking about "Corrupting ... "
2. Writers who do that annoy me to no end. I know I ask for reviews after my chapters, or rather, I beg for reviews , but as a writer I want feedback . I would never, however, "blackmail" the reader.
3. I think that you have a very good point ... I know I don't have a lot of reviews in my "review count", but I'm trying to make the effort to review what I read. It's a bit disconcerting when I see fics with many reviews and the author hasn't even left one ...  _________________ ~ boe an phân pedi ‘lam dadui ~
~ everyone should speak a second language ~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roisin

Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 449 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sindohte wrote: | | Cormak wrote: | | Part of the reason I wrote a Legomance was because of who he was cast as in the movie. The other part was because I love his character in the book and he doesn't really get much of a background. We know who his father and grandfather are, but we don't know his mother or if he ever loved anyone. |
That definitely spurred me with my writing efforts. A story about Legolas exploring some of those background issues, such as his family life, etc., not touched upon in either the books or the movies is fascinating. I am curious to see what people can do with those blank spots in his life. Like who were Legolas's friends?
| Quote: | | It's interesting that you brought up about the time frame issue. It's certainly very true that most writers put their stories at the time of the War of the Ring. Part of that might be because they are interested in acquiring readers. Most people lose interest in stories that are made up of one canon character and all original characters UNLESS they write those OCs really well. A lot of readers want to see Aragorn, Gandalf, Frodo and the other hobbits in the story because they relate to those characters more. |
.........
I think that is a shame and can result in two-dimensional characters, instead of a fully realized literary creation. So for some people it might be that they don't want to bother with filling up a few pages of fleshing out the other members of the Fellowship because it might interfere with their romance or maybe they are not sure how to develop a three dimensional character. |
Which is interesting, b/c although we did set our fic partly during the WOTR and immediate aftermath, we ended up with a fair number of OCs running around, both male and female, simply b/c we needed them to make a believable life/background for our OFC. Then sometimes we would just make them up b/c we realized we needed someone to fill a certain niche. "Need a Rohirric soldier here...Fynhelm!!"
And then there's Elladan and Elrohir, who are so thinly sketched in the book that they almost count as OCs.
Roisin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|