| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NancyBrooke Challenge Admin
Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 160 Location: In a motel 6 by the airport
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wrong again.
NB - mad capitalizer _________________ NB Duchess of WHY TF Cant'chu Punctuate, First Duchess of F*&(ing &*ll yur comma placement sux!
Nazgul #3 in charge of ducking & sniggering
Garo golf a conu ned i eneth aran an ir ho delitha ad |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpaceWeavil

Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Looking at shiny things
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually I dunno, Nancy. I'm still debating this, but I just found a little bit in my Writer's Manual (whim buy #561347) that has proper nouns capitalised, as I think has been said above.
The way it's talking, I would think it would be, because the term is being used as a proper noun, instead of using the guy's name. I'm still not 100% sure though.
English is such a weird language. _________________ Pervy Nazgul Fancier and owner of Fluffy the Fell Beast |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yavanie

Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 630 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
okay, my two cents:
instinct says go with Al, it's not Minister Bob shortened to just Minister. It's a general reference to the minister. If you put 'the' in there indicating it is "the minister', like "the boy", "the girl" then no, don't capitalize.
However, if it is indeed Minister Joe or Father Bob and you are writing "Howdy" Father said. or "Hello" Minister answered, then yes if it is truly used as shortened version of their name, not as a reference to a particular type of person, like the minister, not the boy.
Purely instinct on this one, feel free to consult an expert guide or reference (and let us know). _________________ Yavanie
...I understand the sadness of the Elves, and I have seen Mordor.
To be older and wiser you must first be younger and stupider. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpaceWeavil

Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Looking at shiny things
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yavanie wrote: | okay, my two cents:
instinct says go with Al, it's not Minister Bob shortened to just Minister. It's a general reference to the minister. If you put 'the' in there indicating it is "the minister', like "the boy", "the girl" then no, don't capitalize.
However, if it is indeed Minister Joe or Father Bob and you are writing "Howdy" Father said. or "Hello" Minister answered, then yes if it is truly used as shortened version of their name, not as a reference to a particular type of person, like the minister, not the boy.
Purely instinct on this one, feel free to consult an expert guide or reference (and let us know). |
That I understand and that makes sense to me. Unfortunately my book has just confused me again - I'm talking political ministers, here, as in MSPs, and in one sentence it's referring to them as the Scottish Ministers, capitalized, with all the other titles like First Minister, Deputy First Minister, Minister for Education and Training, etc all like that. But then said 'such a minister would have to...' in the next paragraph.
So since this guy is the minister for something, as in he's Deputy First Minister, then my instinct would be that he's the Minister, rather than just a minister.
Does that make any sense, because I just woke up and my brain hasn't quite kicked in yet  _________________ Pervy Nazgul Fancier and owner of Fluffy the Fell Beast |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yavanie

Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 630 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
So instead of "Deputy First Minister Bubba" , he is referred to as The Minister (short for the Deputy First Minister) then you are probably on good footing. But the book is correct in it's general use of The Minister of A, Deputy Minister B, First Base Minister C and then stating that such a minister would need to..... (as in one from the group of officers above, but not one in particular).
Also, just write it, be consistent. Get it out to a couple of betas and see what the general consensus is. (and do let us know what they suggest).
again, my instinct, not based on looking it up in a reference. _________________ Yavanie
...I understand the sadness of the Elves, and I have seen Mordor.
To be older and wiser you must first be younger and stupider. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
inglor

Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 853 Location: Not here, not there, not anywhere
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
.........
Inglor _________________ Hi, My name is Inglor and I am a Tolkien Geek (sub-species: Silgeek)
Owner of the phrase: "merciless attention" so authorized by Viv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpaceWeavil

Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Looking at shiny things
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yavanie wrote: | So instead of "Deputy First Minister Bubba" , he is referred to as The Minister (short for the Deputy First Minister) then you are probably on good footing. But the book is correct in it's general use of The Minister of A, Deputy Minister B, First Base Minister C and then stating that such a minister would need to..... (as in one from the group of officers above, but not one in particular).
Also, just write it, be consistent. Get it out to a couple of betas and see what the general consensus is. (and do let us know what they suggest).
again, my instinct, not based on looking it up in a reference. |
Yeah, I'm hoping to find someone to look over it eventually. I'm at the stage of getting general opinions, as I'm still on rough drafts right now, but eventually I really want to get someone to beta this. _________________ Pervy Nazgul Fancier and owner of Fluffy the Fell Beast |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leaward
Joined: 11 Dec 2004 Posts: 25 Location: a tiny padded room in Arnor
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm coming into the discussion a couple days late ...
I checked my Harbrace College Handbook (mine is for Canadian Writers) but the rules are pretty much similar to the American rules.
--Dr. Freda E. Watts or "Tell me, Doctor, what's the verdict?"
but every doctor, my doctor
--the War of 1812 ....but ....a space war in 1999
--Harvard University but ... a university like Harvard
--the U.S. Navy ... a strong navy
--December, Christmas .... winter, holiday
--the West, Westerners .... to fly west, western regions
--Canadian Nurses' Association ... an association for Canadian nurses
--Parkinson's disease .... flu, asthma, leukemia
--a Chihuahua, Ford trucks ... a beagle, pickup trucks (now that one confuses me because a beagle is a breed the same as a Chiahuaha but I guess it's because Chihuahua is an actual place name ... see example below...)
--two Liberal candidates (Liberal is a Canadian political party, Americans can substitute Republicans or Democrats). .... a liberal education
--the Charter of Rights ... a kind of charter of rights
From a course I took in February by Kathy Witlox (Grammar for Writers: The Almost jargon-Free Version) who is 'Grammar Girl' on the e-harlequin website and has terrific articles on grammar and punctuation: http://www.eharlequin.com/cms/learntowrite/ltwSection.jhtml;jsessionid=RMXMNRLFHZ14ZLAUEAKCAOQ?itcType=grammarGirl
Capitalization:
People's names: Jim Walker, Trish Cramer
Business Names: Westside Convenience, Microsoft
Government bodies: Ministry of Education, Department of Motor Vehicles
Place names: Scotland, Ontario, Australia, South American (and their adjectival forms: Scottish, Ontarian, Australian)
Professional titles that are used with names (or often in lieu of) Dr Li, Father Irving, Mrs. Jones, Aunt Sara
Other titles, including those of books, magzines, movies, etc.
Other names including those of teams, boats, products (Blue Jays, Yankees, Americruiser, Coke, Pepsi)
Military titles with names: General Schmidt, Private Ryan
When not to capitalize:
Most professional titles unless they're used as a substitute for a name "Prime Minister, when will the US open the door to our cattle?" or The prime minister congratulated the minister of education and the teachers that worked for the ministry.
Business departments unless used without an article:
Both Bob and his wife worked in the marketing department
Both Bob and his wife worked in Marketing
Titles that are preceded by an article:
Beth's uncle Mike cradled the newborn in his big arms.
The plane's captain announced he was ready for takeoff.
Most dog breed names, unless they contain a proper noun or its adjectival form. German shepherd, golden retriever, Labrador retriever
Directional words unless part of a region "the East Coast" but "drive east on Adelaide"
And as was pointed out in an earlier post...
My mother said I could go to the party. Mother said I could go to the party.
Hope that helps! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpaceWeavil

Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Looking at shiny things
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's great of you to go to the trouble of putting that list there. thanks
The only one I'm still weird on is the Prime Minister one, as every textbook I have has it capitalised no matter what. Possibly that's a distinction between American English and the British English I'm using.
Mind you, saying that, this is the textbook on constitutional law that has 'beings' instead of begins, 'trail' instead of trial, and Sots Law instead of Scots Law. I'm beginning to think that particular publisher has been skimping on proof-reader's fees lately. _________________ Pervy Nazgul Fancier and owner of Fluffy the Fell Beast |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leaward
Joined: 11 Dec 2004 Posts: 25 Location: a tiny padded room in Arnor
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Possibly that's a distinction between American English and the British English I'm using. |
That's what makes the internet so interesting ... each country has their own standards. There was a discussion a while back on Stories of Arda about quotation marks because the Brits use single quotes, the Americans use double quotes, while the Dutch apparently can use single quotes unless they want to indicate shouting when they can use double quotes -- so the quotes are almost like an exclamation mark!
The lady who taught the grammar course told us how a book that had been edited for the British public was released in United States using the Brit rules and they had tons of complaints because of the 'u's that were left in valour, honour, etc. and the use of 's' in words like recognise where the Americans would use a 'z' .
Canadians use the u's and the z's (which we do pronounce as Zed not Zee.) What can I say, we're a completely mixed up group who borrows our grammar from everyone!
Anyway, glad that humungous post might be of some help.
Lea |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpaceWeavil

Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Looking at shiny things
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Leaward wrote: | | Quote: | | Possibly that's a distinction between American English and the British English I'm using. |
That's what makes the internet so interesting ... each country has their own standards. There was a discussion a while back on Stories of Arda about quotation marks because the Brits use single quotes, the Americans use double quotes, while the Dutch apparently can use single quotes unless they want to indicate shouting when they can use double quotes -- so the quotes are almost like an exclamation mark!
The lady who taught the grammar course told us how a book that had been edited for the British public was released in United States using the Brit rules and they had tons of complaints because of the 'u's that were left in valour, honour, etc. and the use of 's' in words like recognise where the Americans would use a 'z' .
Canadians use the u's and the z's (which we do pronounce as Zed not Zee.) What can I say, we're a completely mixed up group who borrows our grammar from everyone!
Anyway, glad that humungous post might be of some help.
Lea |
I read that recently about the double / single quotation marks. It's a bit odd to me, since I was always taught to use double ones when I was at school. That's one thing I don't really bother too much about though, as I'm sure it'd be changed if necessary, and people know what I mean,
As for spelling, my first ever beta reader sent me back a story I'd written and told me in very sharp terms to stop bothering her until I'd learned to spell properly. She said 'for God's sake, you even spelled 'color' wrong!', whereupon I found out she was American and seemed not to know that there were two different systems. Until coming to Open Scrolls, I had terrible luck with betas....  _________________ Pervy Nazgul Fancier and owner of Fluffy the Fell Beast |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leaward
Joined: 11 Dec 2004 Posts: 25 Location: a tiny padded room in Arnor
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even within each country there are different rules according to whatever book you go by, for instance, Daw the Minstrel uses the Chicago Book of Rules for her editing, but others I know use the AP standards. I use the Harbrace College Handbook, but I could just as easily use one of several other Canadian standards put out usually by newspapers such as the Toronto Star. I'm sure that applies to England as well.
Plus grammar is fluid and changes with the time. For instance, comma usage has definitely changed since I was in school. Now they go with 'open punctuation' meaning you don't need to use as many commas. *shrugs* I can't keep up,
I think the main thing I've noticed my beta's looking for is that my writing is consistent puncutation and grammar-wise So if you use single quotes for your dialogue, use single quotes all the way through (unless you're from the Netherlands perhaps ... Rhapsody will have to clear that up for me) Same with capitalizing Elves or Rangers for instance. For that I go back to Tolkien and say 'if it's good enough for him, that's how I'll do it!" and then I still forget, LOL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ellisk

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Icon by Alassante! Wow!
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just read all this because it's been bothering me too and here's my conclusion: I hate English--I'm going to start writing this stuff in Spanish. The rules are much more straigt forward and I speak it better anyway.  _________________ It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.
Ultima ratio regum (The Last Argument of Kings)--engraved on all French cannons by order of Louis XIV |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|