Login

Lost Password?

Create New Account

Personality Traits

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Annamire



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Location: The Funny Farm

PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:09 pm    Post subject: Personality Traits Reply with quote

I am a girl who adores "little known" characters and in canon OCs, it's a thing I can't shake.

Anyways, I tend to put a bit of myself into each character the Tolkien doesn't talk much about/OC and was wondering if anyone else did something like it.

For example, I am deathly terrified of spiders (to the point where my sister Rachel screams "Spider!" to make me jump on our dining room table screaming Embarassed ) so I'll give a character a fear of spiders or something. Never to the point of self-insertion, but enough so that it makes it easier for me to relate to what the character goes through, and thus makes it easier for me to write.

Anyways, it's be interesting to know if anyone else does this/has similar quirks.

~Annamire

_________________
Mrs. DeVries: Yes maybe we'll blow something up on Wednesday.
J.J.: Can we make a Molotov Cocktail?
---
Me: Feel the wrath of SUSHI!
Sushi(Rachel): HEY!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
SpaceWeavil



Joined: 27 May 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Looking at shiny things

PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The only one I remember was Celebrian in 'Alliance'. She ended up with quite a few of my personality traits, the poor thing (but at the same time, when I was writing that story I wanted to draw away from the portrayals of her as a cold-hearted woman who viciously abandoned Elrond, which I'd read a lot of. Not saying that interpretation is wrong, since we have no idea what Celebrian was like, but I wanted to do something different).

For other characters, I honestly can't remember (Rhapsody asked me once which stories I enjoyed writing and I realised that I can rarely remember much about my stories once they're finished). I tend to use little things here and there a lot, small experiences maybe rather than personality traits. For instance, when I had the teenage Witch King of Angmar running away from his parent's halls in 'And in the Darkness Bind Them' at one point, I drew a bit on the one attempt I made to run away as a child. That was a really tiny part of the story, but the experience I remembered let me add a bit of weight to it, I think.

I tend to look at writing like a form of acting - when I have to use a certain character's 'voice' to write, I kind of have to take on their personality, and to do that I use imagination and experience.

I expect that's more rambling than anyone actually wanted, but I'm putting off doing Jurisprudence...

_________________
Pervy Nazgul Fancier and owner of Fluffy the Fell Beast
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Rous



Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 358
Location: Trying to stay below the radar

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is interesting as most people do not want to discuss what could be construed as Mary Suism.

I tend to go to the opposite extreme. I give my characters the things I think I lack. Not to the point of unbelievability, but just strengths I wish I had. I think my life is pretty plain and pathetic, and I want my characters to have better than that. For example, I am very withdrawn and get my feelings easily hurt. Most of my characters come from humble beginnings, but show strength and courage, in moderation. I do not want super-heroes, but rather the one who rises above the circumstances.

Did that answer the question?

_________________
The only opinions that count, are those of the ones in control.
You make hay while the sun shines; beans you can combine after dark.
Duchess of the Independent Resort State of Mexico (est. 10/28/2004)
Purveyor of Buttershots and popcorn. Drunk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
ZeeDrippyVessel



Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 144
Location: deep south

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:46 pm    Post subject: Hmmm.... Reply with quote

Interesting question and yes - one that could quickly explode into THe Mary Sue Argument.

Any writer worth their salt will write 1. What they know and 2. What they are attracted to. In short, they will write themselves or what they wish to be into a character somewhere. It might not be a 'self insert', but a bit of everyone's blood is in them.

But that's my 2 cents worth and it's not worth much. So nyah.

_________________
Zee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Sulriel



Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 286
Location: Imladris (or maybe Texas ...)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:10 pm    Post subject: Personality Traits Reply with quote

I expect a *real* self-insert could be interesting to read, depending on the author's life. It seems to me that the problem with MarySue is that she tends to be a fantastical self-indulgent insert. -and that isn't what's meant by 'write what you know'.

Typically, a writer can add levels of depth and believability to their fiction by "writing what they know" - that doesn't mean that you should write yourself into the story. What it means is to take elements of your life that are applicable to the story and use them to enhance the story. If you have a habit about yourself that you love or hate, you can use that to make a character more memorable. Maybe not the main character, but maybe so. If you're self-conscience about it, change it slightly. For example, if you have a habit of biting your nails, you could make one of your characters compulsive about cleaning their nails. -maybe they carry a small knife and have it out all the time cleaning their nails - or picking their teeth - or something obnoxious and slightly disgusting they have to remember not to do in polite company.

The difficult part tends to be in writing *personal* experiences from your *character's* point of view. You aren't writing about yourself, you are simply putting parts of yourself in the character. There is a huge difference. You have to take the personal experience and adjust it to your character's age and life and write it how they would experience it.

Simply being alive gives us all rich experiences to put in our characters and stories. Birth, death, love, loss, joy, pain. - to some extent we've all lived these things, either ourselves or through people close to us - use those things to enrich your stories instead of shying away from them. - again, - it isn't a matter of writing yourself into the story, but to provide a richer story through personal experience -

and not just emotion, but other kinds of knowledge and experience. Do your research, but for the most part it's the 'little things' that make the difference. Not just how her heart aches, or is numb, but how a seamstress's finger's feel when she's been sewing body bags closed for two days? If you don't sew, talk to someone who does to get those details. the needles and thread, the thimble, how the cloth chaps her skin.

take an archery lesson, even just one. find out which muscles ache. Maybe yours ache on the third draw, an Elf might last three days, but the same muscles would be sore.

every experience that you live enriches you in some way and by putting those in your stories will enrich your stories.

.... looks around for another example and falls off soapbox ....

_________________
"May it be a light to you in dark places."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rous



Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 358
Location: Trying to stay below the radar

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember answering this in another setting. In my opinion, almost everything ever written would have to be self-insertion, to a degree. Otherwise, the written word would be droll and dry. I truly believe that most fiction is written because at some point, someone wanted to write a story with themselves as a character. I am not talking about Mary Sue here, but rather that part of us we think would be attractive to others, or repulsive, if that is what the writer is going for. Tell me that George Lucas does not wish, somewhere in the very depths of his imagination that he could be like Luke or Han.
_________________
The only opinions that count, are those of the ones in control.
You make hay while the sun shines; beans you can combine after dark.
Duchess of the Independent Resort State of Mexico (est. 10/28/2004)
Purveyor of Buttershots and popcorn. Drunk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Sulriel



Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 286
Location: Imladris (or maybe Texas ...)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rous wrote:
I remember answering this in another setting. In my opinion, almost everything ever written would have to be self-insertion, to a degree. Otherwise, the written word would be droll and dry. I truly believe that most fiction is written because at some point, someone wanted to write a story with themselves as a character. I am not talking about Mary Sue here, but rather that part of us we think would be attractive to others, or repulsive, if that is what the writer is going for. Tell me that George Lucas does not wish, somewhere in the very depths of his imagination that he could be like Luke or Han.


I agree with that although I think it's really too broad. I think that, to a point, all of us (not just writers) wish to be brave, strong, sexy, rescued by a handsome prince, etc...

- also, consider that what you are saying could tend to confuse motivation with technique.

I love being in Middle-earth and I find that writing characters in that world gives me a closenss to it. But that's why I write, not how. For many people it may be the why *and* the how. -but motivation for artistic creation is going to be different for each individual.

I use personal knowledge, life experiences and character traits from myself and other people I know well to deepen and enrich the characters in my story. - that's technique, skill, craft - the 'how'.

I think the difference is important...

_________________
"May it be a light to you in dark places."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rous



Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 358
Location: Trying to stay below the radar

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sulriel wrote:
Rous wrote:
I remember answering this in another setting. In my opinion, almost everything ever written would have to be self-insertion, to a degree. Otherwise, the written word would be droll and dry. I truly believe that most fiction is written because at some point, someone wanted to write a story with themselves as a character. I am not talking about Mary Sue here, but rather that part of us we think would be attractive to others, or repulsive, if that is what the writer is going for. Tell me that George Lucas does not wish, somewhere in the very depths of his imagination that he could be like Luke or Han.


I agree with that although I think it's really too broad. I think that, to a point, all of us (not just writers) wish to be brave, strong, sexy, rescued by a handsome prince, etc...

- also, consider that what you are saying could tend to confuse motivation with technique.

I love being in Middle-earth and I find that writing characters in that world gives me a closenss to it. But that's why I write, not how. For many people it may be the why *and* the how. -but motivation for artistic creation is going to be different for each individual.

I use personal knowledge, life experiences and character traits from myself and other people I know well to deepen and enrich the characters in my story. - that's technique, skill, craft - the 'how'.

I think the difference is important...


I see what you are saying, and agree; my point was that any writer (not fanfic) is bound to add something of themselves to their work. I think that is what makes a good writer, they can add themselves, to a degree, without taking it over the top. If you concentrate on one writer, generally, their characters tend to carry the same traits. I have noticed this with a few of my favourite authors. I am not saying this is an absolute, but I do know that when the book is dry, I believe it is because the writer adds nothing; their character is boring, and it affects the rest of their endevours: dialogue, description, scenery; everything is connected. Without that little bit of "self-insertion", the writing may be flat. I am not talking about blatant "I am the hero" stuff (I think I mentioned that) but rather what other have said: strength of character, moral values, bad habits, fears, etc. Some write about those very things because they have them. Others write the opposite of what they are. I am just saying that in moderation, this is not a bad thing. And, I think that any author worth his/her salt does this. Imagine how boring the world would be if people wrote about their personal lives. I mean, some are outstanding, but most of us have really boring existences. I for one would rather read someone's fantasy than their actual life.

*stashes soapbox safely in closet for another day*

_________________
The only opinions that count, are those of the ones in control.
You make hay while the sun shines; beans you can combine after dark.
Duchess of the Independent Resort State of Mexico (est. 10/28/2004)
Purveyor of Buttershots and popcorn. Drunk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Sulriel



Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 286
Location: Imladris (or maybe Texas ...)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rous wrote:
I see what you are saying, and agree; my point was that any writer (not fanfic) is bound to add something of themselves to their work. I think that is what makes a good writer, they can add themselves, to a degree, without taking it over the top.


totally agree, but I think it applies to pro writers and fanfic as well. It's a matter of balance. I also think, especially in regards to pro writing, the author has to be able to step outside their bounds and write from perspectives that may be far different from their personal viewpoints. They'll still use personal experience, knowledge and value systems, that sort of thing, but they have to be able to stretch it or look at it from the other side.

Quote:
If you concentrate on one writer, generally, their characters tend to carry the same traits. I have noticed this with a few of my favorite authors. I am not saying this is an absolute,


I do think it approaches 'absolute' because it generates a following of readers who look for that specific kind of character. Many pro authors even go so far as to use different pennames to cross genres unless they feel they can pull their current following into the next aisle of the book store (like from romance to paranormal romance or from mystery to horror).. - which is a little different from what you're saying - genre vs characterization, -because the characterization can be similar regardless of the genre... I believe that getting the reader base hooked on characterization is what allows an author to slide or even switch genres.


Quote:
but I do know that when the book is dry, I believe it is because the writer adds nothing; their character is boring, and it affects the rest of their endevours: dialogue, description, scenery; everything is connected. Without that little bit of "self-insertion", the writing may be flat.
Quote:
I am not talking about blatant "I am the hero" stuff


I disagree *slightly* with the above. It's related, but I'm not sure it's as much cause and effect as I'm reading in your post. -a matter of nuance, I admit, Wink

I agree that if the writer adds nothing of them selves the writing will tend to be flat, but I think that's only a small part of the cause of flat writing and not completely dependant on each other.

I also agree with the extremes, - that either no or all self-insertion will be problematic for a story. - and I think in part, (to circle back a bit), this is where MarySue has had some rebound damage in the fandom because so many people tend to completely reject any type or amount of self-insertion, leading (basically) to some unlikely and/or unrealistic characterizations and actions - to the point of popping the reader out of the story. Even the wildest fantasy has to have enough basis and grounding for the reader to connect with - which goes directly back to your Lucas example. Star Wars, as a whole, connected with a lot of people, through the characterization and the plot.

Quote:
(I think I mentioned that) but rather what other have said: strength of character, moral values, bad habits, fears, etc. Some write about those very things because they have them. Others write the opposite of what they are. I am just saying that in moderation, this is not a bad thing.


agree again - even to the point of where you say 'not a bad thing', I'd say it's needed. Writing the opposite of what you know is still writing what you know.

Quote:
And, I think that any author worth his/her salt does this. Imagine how boring the world would be if people wrote about their personal lives. I mean, some are outstanding, but most of us have really boring existences. I for one would rather read someone's fantasy than their actual life.


Three cheers for imagination!!

but yes, we don't want to read about getting up, drinking coffee and driving to work. - we do it every day. ...booooring ... - sometimes you have to dig a little, but I think - those of us here anyway - have a spark that keeps us going through that daily grind and that's what has to be tapped into and grown. -back to one of my earlier posts... we've all had some amount of life experiences, a good author will tap into those shamelessly and weave them subtly throughout the story in order to connect with the reader's own life experiences and dreams and keep them hooked.

Quote:
*stashes soapbox safely in closet for another day*


*stares at soapbox* *ROUS has been using my soapbox* Smile

Thanks for this good discussion, it's been thought provoking

_________________
"May it be a light to you in dark places."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Alassante
Virtual Village Mod


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 20
Location: Hitchhiking to Rivendell

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think events you write about also touch your story deeply. I know in one of my stories I wrote about when Glorfindel first saw his daughter. I wrote from the heart the feelings I had when they first laid my baby boy in my arms. I had someone (a guy even!) PM me telling me that it made him want to go hug his daughter because he remembered feeling that way when he first saw her. So the closer the event is in life to you, the more impactful I think your writing can be. Unfortunatly most of the exciting stuff that happens in my fiction never happened to me. Sad Maybe if I wrote original fiction rather than about elves, it might come closer to real life. Nah. I'm with Rous, my life is too boring. Embarassed I pity the Mary Sue self-insert fashioned after me.

*I didn't get a soapbox Shocked - all I got was a Tide bottle - I tried to stand on it and squished it. Ah well....*

_________________
Nagzul #2 - The Nazgul of Shmoove
Crucio! Because stupidity should be painful!
http://alikat7.livejournal.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Sulriel



Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 286
Location: Imladris (or maybe Texas ...)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alassante wrote:
I think events you write about also touch your story deeply. I know in one of my stories I wrote about when Glorfindel first saw his daughter. I wrote from the heart the feelings I had when they first laid my baby boy in my arms. I had someone (a guy even!) PM me telling me that it made him want to go hug his daughter because he remembered feeling that way when he first saw her. So the closer the event is in life to you, the more impactful I think your writing can be.


IMO, this is *exactly* how it's supposed to work. -and it sounds like it did work well for you. - You were able to put the real emotion in the story and it connected for the readers - because it was *real* -even though it was about an Elf, the real emotion was there.

Quote:
*I didn't get a soapbox Shocked - all I got was a Tide bottle - I tried to stand on it and squished it. Ah well....*


*offers Al a soapbox*

_________________
"May it be a light to you in dark places."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum