| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Favourite Sword? |
| Glamdring |
|
9% |
[ 3 ] |
| Orchist |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Anduril |
|
30% |
[ 10 ] |
| Aiglos (Spear, but who cares?) |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Sting |
|
15% |
[ 5 ] |
| Araruth |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Herugrim |
|
12% |
[ 4 ] |
| Guthwine |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Gurtholfin |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Other |
|
18% |
[ 6 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 33 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Andreth
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 1211
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, Hadhafang is a movie invention, Elvenesse, and I'll behave and not comment on the beauty of Ereinion Gil-galad's spear.
Avert your eyes, Hannah - it's another long post.
Let me see if I can give a quick cliff notes version of BB's weapons list:
Glamdring - Gandalf's 'foe-hammer', found in the Hobbit when Bilbo was poking around in the trolls' booty ( ) Forged in Gondolin according to Elrond. It Kills Goblins Dead. It also glowed with a blue light, according to the descriptions of the sword.
Given the Elvish Mirdain stamp of approval, guaranteed to make goblins start screaming gibberish and piss their pants.
Orcrist (typo) - Another sword found in the trolls' cave stash - the Goblin cleaver and also forged in Gondolin. I think the goblins called this one Biter. Whatever unnamed Gondolin Elf carried it killed lots of goblins with it. Buried with Thorin Oakenshield in his tomb in the Lonely Mountain.
Anduril - I'm sure everybody knows this one. Flame of the West, Narsil reforged, Aragorn's sword...yada, yada, yada. I remember that it was forged by Telchar, that uber-handy Dwarf to have around for helms and swords, but I don't recall how it got from Telchar in the First Age to Elendil on Numenor. Anybody know off hand? Going to have to look through UT for that one.
Aiglos - Ereinion Gil-galad's spear, Snow-point, that he carried in the Battle of the Last Alliance - long, powerful and he sure knew how to use it...I'm sorry, where was I?
Sting - Bilbo's sword of course, (he sure enjoyed that troll booty) and it rounded out the triple threat tag team with Orcrist and Glamdring. Also made in Gondolin. Completely OT, but I'd once heard the speculation somewhere that Maeglin probably forged these while he was in Gondolin, since his father, Eol, was known for making strange and powerful swords. Very interesting theory.
Aranruth - This is one of Thingol's swords from the First Age. The only specifics I recall off hand are from Unfinished Tales where it says the sword was passed down by the Kings of Numenor as an heirloom and it was lost, I suppose when the island was destroyed.
Herugrim - King Theoden's sword. Hama found it packratted away in one of Grima Wormtongue's chests and brought it back to Theoden. I'm guessing he carried it into war afterward and kicked major ass with it.
Guthwine - This one's Eomer's sword and I really don't know much about it. Maybe somebody who's better acquainted with Eomer's sword can give more info.
Gurtholfin - This was a name used in the Book of Lost Tales, but in the Silm and everywhere else its called Gurthang.
This one was originally called Anglachel and forged by Eol out of some kind of meteor rock along with its mate, Anguirel. I believe both swords were black because of this super-strong meteor iron Eol used.
Eol had to give Anglachel to Thingol as payment for being allowed to live in Thingol's woods, then later Thingol gave the sword to Beleg Strongbow when he went to look for Turin at Thingol's request. After Turin kills Beleg with it in a blind fit of rage, it gets reforged and then gets dubbed Gurthang. Then Turin uses it later in a suicidal fit of rage to commit hari kari.
I don't think people were scrambling to have that sword as a heirloom of their house.
Anna |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nillaithial

Joined: 17 May 2003 Posts: 13 Location: In the woodlands of Isodor...
|
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Question to anyone out there....did Legolas's long knives or sword have names?
I don't recall anything in the books, nor is there any reference in the movies. Through my own dementia, I gave one of Legolas's long knives a name and history in my own fanfic....but that's it.
Since I'm obviously partial to Legolas, I'd gladly choose one of his own weapons as my favorite. However, since they seem to be a nameless entity, my next awesome pick is Arwen's sword, Hadhafang (from the movie).....a truly beautiful weapon! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miluiwen

Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 76 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I totally agree. Although I am trying to scrimp together enough money to get Hadhafang (I always waste it on rubbish) I have seen other swords which I am partial to. Glamdring is a lovely sword. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Panneth

Joined: 10 Jun 2003 Posts: 0 Location: Manchester/London
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another one of my irritations with the film - in the book Legolas carries one long knife. In the film he carries those two little knives on his back which admittedly looked much better when killing things. Far more impressive... *ahem*
I don't think it had a name though... _________________ ~ Emma |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nillaithial

Joined: 17 May 2003 Posts: 13 Location: In the woodlands of Isodor...
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Panneth wrote: | | In the film he carries those two little knives on his back which admittedly looked much better when killing things. |
Double-handed weapons always look more elegant and graceful....and it's not that easy to coordinate movements either! (I've always secretly applauded Mr. Bloom for learning those long knives in such a short time span.)
And if you take a close look at them, they aren't quite so little....maybe 24" to 28". I'm only guessing...I'm sure I could look it up and procure the exact size, but I'm too comfortable in my chair right now. From a martial arts student's perspective, that's a decent length for twirling around two steel blades.
I felt one of the most impressive Legolas "moments" in the entire trilogy was when Aragorn, Gimili, and Legolas were handing over their weapons to gain entry to King Theoden's castle.
Legolas removes the knives from his back sheath (hilt up) with one and a half full rotations and presents them to the guard, hilt first....which means somehow or other he had to grab the hilt to take them out, but somewhere in the rotations he manages to grab the blade end in order to present them hilt first. My brain hurts when I look at it. I'm sure there's some movie-magic in there somewhere.
At any rate, my only irritation on this subject is that Legolas's knives didn't have any formal distinctions (like Aragorn's sword or Frodo's sword, etc...) and remained secondary to his bow.
Wouldn't it have been cool if he'd carried some legendary elven sword with him, perhaps given to him by his father, and used it to defeat the cave troll in Moria or bring down one of the other myriad of Mordor ghouls? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sindohte

Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 1621 Location: Rubbing up against an Elf
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Which raises the question - Are Legolas' fighting knives something PJ decided to invent to make his Elven prince of Mirkwood look sexy and dangerous? Because I don't recall anything about the book version of Legolas using that particular type of weapon. Before I had seen the movie, I had always assumed book Legolas just used a sword like everyone else in ME. _________________ abandon thought, and let the dream descend... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miluiwen

Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 76 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nillaithial wrote: | | And if you take a close look at them, they aren't quite so little....maybe 24" to 28". |
I was surprised. I went onto a replica website (yes, I'm sad...) and the ones PJ had designed were only 15 3/4 inches. which is quite a small blade to fight with!
I have always imagined Legs with a sword to tell the truth. Although the knives are nice, I think the sword is the best. If Arwen has a movie sword, (growls) then why can't Legolas?
It even says in the book.. "Legolas had a bow and quiver, and at his belt a LONG WHITE KNIFE."
~sighs~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sindohte

Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 1621 Location: Rubbing up against an Elf
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Miluiwen wrote: |
It even says in the book.. "Legolas had a bow and quiver, and at his belt a LONG WHITE KNIFE."
|
Thanks for pointing out that reference Miluiwen. It would seem to suggest that the fighting knives used in the movie where purely a PJ creation, since the book Legolas only had a single knife. Book Legolas probably used it to put a hurting on all those big bad Mirkwood spiders scuttling about. _________________ abandon thought, and let the dream descend... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nillaithial

Joined: 17 May 2003 Posts: 13 Location: In the woodlands of Isodor...
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ooops....my bad. I didn't think Leg's long knives were THAT short...but hey, they look good on HIM. I guess that's the whole point isn't it? And who knows, perhaps a longer blade simply wasn't practical. I mean Orlando can't exactly hold down the scabbard while he pulls out both knives. I suppose they were necessarily short so that he could look stealthy AND graceful on camera....and not hopping around on one foot whilst trying to pull out a 30" sword fastened to his back!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miluiwen

Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 76 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
No problemo
Good point, nillaithial, about the whole back thing. But it's easy enough to pull out a sword attatched to your belt, I guess. Having those blades attatched to your back is more logical. Even if you had it in a suspension system around your waist, pulling the blades out would be difficult. Knowing me, I'd probably get wacked in the face mid-draw.
Backing up your point, those (somewhat magically travelling) Lothlorien elves that mystically appeared at Helms Deep had some seriously huge swords attatched to their backs along with their quiver. Five foot long.. but then it wouln't be clever to lug around a sword that is half handle, half blade on your belt. I was surprised at the size of those blades, width wise. In the TT EE, someone said (can't remember who) that the width was smaller, then they increased it. Hmmm.... I prefered that prototype which had the thinner blade.
I get yawned at by my friends for my obsession with weaponry
I tend to draw elvish swords. For no reason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MoonRaven

Joined: 29 Feb 2004 Posts: 21 Location: Homer, Alaska
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="BittenBuggy"]And what is up with Anduril winning?!?! You people have no imagination... [/quote]
Oh, maybe so. I'm not that familiar with some of the other weapons listed and besides that, I'm a sucker for the symbolism of "the flame of the west" being re-forged out of the shards of Narsil. Sort of a metaphor for rebirth/resurrection, especially when wielded by a man once known as "Hope". Gets me all sort of shivery.
'Sides, it's a keen-looking weapon with it's stars and runes and all. _________________ --laura
A Quiet Life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Saralitazie
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 297 Location: Stamping Property of Litzy the Lush all over Glorfindel.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nillaithial wrote: | | And who knows, perhaps a longer blade simply wasn't practical. I mean Orlando can't exactly hold down the scabbard while he pulls out both knives. I suppose they were necessarily short so that he could look stealthy AND graceful on camera....and not hopping around on one foot whilst trying to pull out a 30" sword fastened to his back! |
That would DEFINITELY destroy part of the "graceful" image and simply give me more to laugh at him about..while drooling, of course
I voted for Anduril, because I like the name. Flame of the West sounds all cool and stuff...
Y'know, my thoughts were going elsewhere when I saw this topic..and who it was started by, but I'll not elaborate Just further proof of BB/Mora/Andreth perverting me! _________________ "Society does not want free men. They torment freedom, democracy, anything you want. But they do not want free men. Society wants conditioned men; men who march in step." - Henri Charriere
-Litzy the Lush  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
inglor

Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 853 Location: Not here, not there, not anywhere
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My favorite sword: not sword but still has a really cool name and killed 5, count them FIVE, Balrogs: Dramborleg, Tuor's Axe.
Did I read somewhere that it too made it to Numenor and was lost when it sank?
RE: the size of Legolas's KNIFE: I think the Prof used th term knife for a specific reason. Tolkien could have used "small sword" or even "sword" if that is what he meant. But he used the phrase LONG WHITE KNIFE. Knives are generally slender and have a SINGLE edge. A small slender two edged weapon is called a dagger, a longer (but not much longer than a man's forearm and hand) broader two edged weapon is called a short sword, the sword of "Gladiator" fame would be a short sword. While a "sword" of the type Tolkien was familiar with had dual edges, were 3-4 feet long. The Japanese Katana has a single edged and curved but I don't think they are part of Tolkien's world (except for maybe Eglamoth's sword which may have been what the Prof was refering to when he described it as curved in LT 2, the Fall of Gondolin)
I have always pictured his Long White Knife as being no more than 2-2.5 feet long, single edged and 3/4" to 1" wide. Think of a WWI bayonet (Google it if you have no idea what I am talking about). A cutting, thrusting weapon, not a hacking weapon as most "swords" of Tolkien's descripiton are. Since Legolas was primarily an woodland archer, a sword length/size weapon would have been bulky and cumbersome. It could also interfere in using his primary weapon. Slinking through underbrush, climbing trees and generally being stealthy would be hindered by a sword. Legolas could rely on speed and agility to overcome his foes and IMHO a Long knife as I have described would have served him well against any but the most skilled warrior.
I think the two knife movie thing was pretty cool and would have been a very lethal method of combat for him but a just wee bit Hollywood. To effectively use both, he would have to drop his most prized possession, his bow...
Sorry for the essay, but you Ladies finally hit on something I know a good deal about.
Inglor _________________ Hi, My name is Inglor and I am a Tolkien Geek (sub-species: Silgeek)
Owner of the phrase: "merciless attention" so authorized by Viv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AranelMinyatur
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Posts: 60 Location: Western Washington State
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I gotta pop in for my quick vote for Herugrim but the movie sword. I thought it was cool how the horse heads hold the blade. Favorite book sword would have to be Sting as I love how it glows blue when Orcs are about! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miluiwen

Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 76 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2004 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | RE: the size of Legolas's KNIFE: I think the Prof used th term knife for a specific reason. Tolkien could have used "small sword" or even "sword" if that is what he meant. But he used the phrase LONG WHITE KNIFE. Knives are generally slender and have a SINGLE edge. A small slender two edged weapon is called a dagger, a longer (but not much longer than a man's forearm and hand) broader two edged weapon is called a short sword, the sword of "Gladiator" fame would be a short sword. While a "sword" of the type Tolkien was familiar with had dual edges, were 3-4 feet long. The Japanese Katana has a single edged and curved but I don't think they are part of Tolkien's world (except for maybe Eglamoth's sword which may have been what the Prof was refering to when he described it as curved in LT 2, the Fall of Gondolin) |
True, true. In my opinion, I had always imagined Legolas' knife to be the size of a Katana, but with a more shorter handle. Of course it would be curvy, slightly, and inscripted, but that was the shape I thought of immediately when I read the phrase.
| Quote: | | I have always pictured his Long White Knife as being no more than 2-2.5 feet long, single edged and 3/4" to 1" wide. Think of a WWI bayonet (Google it if you have no idea what I am talking about). A cutting, thrusting weapon, not a hacking weapon as most "swords" of Tolkien's descripiton are. Since Legolas was primarily an woodland archer, a sword length/size weapon would have been bulky and cumbersome. It could also interfere in using his primary weapon. Slinking through underbrush, climbing trees and generally being stealthy would be hindered by a sword. Legolas could rely on speed and agility to overcome his foes and IMHO a Long knife as I have described would have served him well against any but the most skilled warrior. |
I've pictured the Knife to be slightly longer, say 4ft. But then, it wouldn't be much of a knife, would it?
| Quote: | | I think the two knife movie thing was pretty cool and would have been a very lethal method of combat for him but a just wee bit Hollywood. |
The PJ inventions just a bit Hollywood? Methinks FOR Hollywood! Deadly asassain... bleh bleh. Imagine the things you can do with a LONG WHITE KNIFE. No pun intended there.
In RotK he is portrayed using one knife to cut down that hefty Mumak platform, and holding the rope, AND his bow with the other. Must be hard...
| Quote: | | To effectively use both, he would have to drop his most prized possession, his bow... |
What made me laugh is how quickly he can hook his bow on his back and then quickly draw his two knives. I would be there for five minutes fumbling for the hook... But then, Elves are quick...
| Quote: | | Sorry for the essay, but you Ladies finally hit on something I know a good deal about. |
I like sword essays! It's interesting to get everyone's ideas.
Mil |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|